Books!

Mar. 12th, 2025 06:42 pm
wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

I have finally read books! Depressing ones, because of who I am as a person!

How To Survive a Plague by David French

A very detailed look at the New York gay community’s response to the AIDs crisis. Like, it goes into specific people’s romantic drama levels of detail.

By the end of it, I was definitely not crying, I was just chopping onions while listening to an audiobook. Just. Man. You had a disease that was a death sentence and no one knew why and then, with the help of the doctors every gay guy went to get STI treatment from because they were cool, and Wall Streeters with congressional ambitions, to drug addicted sex workers, to grad students adding baking soda to industrial processes-- it became a something you could take a pill for and the pills actually worked. People got out of hospital beds and then lived to the end of their natural lifespans. So many people died but-- people got to live.

Some random takeaways:

  • At the beginning, there was debate about whether AIDs was caused by a virus, or by a semen overload/allergy. Weirdly enough, the second theory was considered less homophobic? Also, it took people years to go “wait, it doesn’t matter if it’s caused by a virus or by semen itself, we all agree that exposure is the dangerous thing, so. Uh. Why not use condoms?”
  • I did not, going into this, expect to end up deeply dislike Dr Anthony Fauci, or questioning why we gave him another shot at handling a crisis. But I do think Dr Fauci should consider signing up for a randomised controlled trial of whether being punched by time travelling Australians increases Good Sense in infectious disease researchers.
  • I am endlessly charmed by the pharmaceutical researchers who, trying to hurry things to a human trial where they might save patient lives, did the initial animal testing for safety and bioavailability on ‘big chimps.’
  • Wow, AIDs activists were a strange bunch. Like, they tended to be either doomsayers (who started multiple non profits and got kicked out of them for causing too much social drama) or the sort of person who when told “you’re going to die in two years, it’s going to suck, and every time you get stressed you take another step into the grave” went “quick! I need to do an activism! Take over a pharmaceutical company as a protest!”
  • Speaking of which there needs to be an Act Up heist movie. Pride (2014) is not enough, we need more.

Our Bodies, Their Battlefield by Christine Lamb

A book about rape as a tool of war and genocide, mostly made up of interviews with survivors.

It’s deeply depressing and requires all the content warnings, especially because it gets quite graphic. Very informative though! To give an example of something that does not require all the content warnings: there’s a conflict between war crimes prosecutors and survivors of sexual violence, because the prosecutors tend to go “the definition of torture includes sexual assault, by charging these people with torture, I have covered both sexual and non-sexual torture.” Meanwhile survivors often want people to be additionally prosecuted for rape, and don’t see prosecuting people for torture as ‘counting.’

I do have some caveats: this was very much written by a journalist, and It Shows. The interviews are very good, the analysis occaisionally goes off the rails, and there’s this thing where-- hmm, how to phrase. There’s calls for the international community to ‘do something.’ Sometimes this ‘something’ has a subject, object and a verb, is something the international community can do, and is something that public pressure might cause a change to. (For example, charging war criminals with torture and rape.) Sometimes the something is left very vague, in ways that implies Lamb wants a US backed coup and doesn’t realising that’s what she’s suggesting?

Also it, was written in 2020, which is just long enough for some of the statements to have aged… interestingly.

Links

books!

Feb. 5th, 2025 05:58 pm
wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

ain't I a woman? by bell hooks

"Wolffy, did you intentionally read this in February?" No, I tried to read it in January and failed. It's an interesting and also deeply depressing history of the affects of racism and sexism on Black women in the US.

Some observations, not the most important, but interesting: - wow, you can really tell this was written in the early 80s. Both things like "I have no clue what media she is referencing" and also things like "what do you mean the women's liberation movement didn't have a transformative affect on US culture?" There was one part where she was talking about the relative prominence of different civil rights activists and how the men were more famous, and she talked about how [paraphrased] "people know about (man I do not remember the name of because I have literally never heard of him*) but they don't know about Rosa Parks." Man, the past was a different country. - this book is weirdly like Darwin's On the Origin of Species. Hear me out: on of the things that's really noticeable is that he is having to argue his point with one hand behind his back, because evolution through natural selection only works if there is some source of heritable variance, and he knew of neither DNA nor the fact it can mutate. ain't I a woman? has a similar thing going on with the idea of intersectionality. Which makes sense, this was written 8 years before Crenshaw's paper, but you can feel hooks having to make her arguments much more [wiggle hands] deliberately and carefully than she would if that idea was already in the academic water. - so, bell hooks is one of those relatively famous authors who people don't... read that often. And certain ideas of hers get quoted more often. So, I knew going in that she was Very Pro Friendship, but not that she didn't like birth control and was anticapitalist. Though she comes by her anticapitalism honestly: she does not want us to become hunter-gatherers, but she does deeply dislike a system where people throw their time/energy/dignity into something that makes more money for other people.

*I feel bad that I cannot check his name, but alas, audiobooks.

Dungeon Meshi by Ryoko Kui

I recently finished the anime, which adapts the manga up to the halfway point, and then kind of. inhaled the manga. It's really really good. The art, the characters, the worldbuilding, it's all phenomenal.

It's about a party of adventurers whose healer got eaten by a dragon as she teleported them back to the surface. They're going to go down there to rescue and resurrect her before she gets fully digested-- but they are short on money and time, and so to survive the dungeon, they must eat the monsters in the dungeon.

Now, I originally passed on this anime/manga because it sounded like a particularly fantastical entry in that Japanese genre of Episodic Food Stories. And the food is important, but the story is much more concerned about systems. Ecosystems, economic systems, all slathered with the sauce of What Food Means. It is actually "deeper than it sounds.*

It's good!

Just as a content warning: there is a whole lot of cannibalism, and later in the story there's a lot of sexual assault as visual metaphor. (Which I am not warning for because it's in poor taste, the metaphor is part of what Kui is trying to say, but it is Pretty Graphic at points.)

Links - text: [how only fans took over the world]( https://aella.substack.com/p/how-onlyfans-took-over-the-world) (nsfw, natch) - text: [how to deal with stress when you can't really affect the situation] (https://bsky.app/profile/questauthority.bsky.social/post/3lgrwi3jiwc24) - video: ToddInTheShadows' top 10 pop songs of 2024 - video: why Russian history makes War Thunder players leak classified documents - video: what do Swedish and Norwegian speakers thing of each other's languages?

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

The Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde by Robert Louis Stephenson

I continue my unofficial project to read all the "classics I should read" on audiobook. It's a fun little story, and I think it does lose something with the fact that Everyone Knows the Twist, but it's good.

But I'm about to interrogate the text from the wrong perspective. I'm going to take a death mask of the author and put it on a rescuci-anne: you could really do an interesting queer or disability reading of that story. You've got the secret alter egos and the whole thing where... people REALLY don't like Mr Hyde, and while some of this is because he does alarming shit, a lot of it is because he looks 'secretly deformed' and just gives off bad vibes. There's just this thing where-- I don't want to ignore the murder? But by word count people spend more time off put by Hyde's appearance than his actions. Jekyll goes on and on about being repressed and wanting to physically transform, and PEOPLE ARE MORE OFFPUT BY THE TRANSFORMATION THAN THE MURDER.

Also there's this thing-- completely uninitentional unless Stephenson had a time machine-- where there's a mirror scene. And it is weirdly similar (weirdly mirrors, eh, eh? [rimshot]) to the mirror scenes you get in trans coming of age stories.

In particular Jekyll is feeling straightjacketed by his role as a respectable gentlemen, which. well. Not the intended reading but it sure is there. It creates the mental image of "Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde vs Dr Jekyll if she discovers oestrogen (the book is about as long but has way less murders)"

On the other hand, so much of the descriptions of Hyde are about how hairy he is and. I cannot recommend making a modern, transmasc reinterpretation, but you totally could. The thematic stuff is There. Especially if you did stuff about the way [wiggle hands] queer/feminist communities can interpret masculinity qua masculinity as evil.

Paladin's Strength by T Kingfisher

[personal profile] chocochipbiscuit recommended this to me and they were SO RIGHT. This is excellent romantasy. T Kingfisher should consider writing more psychologically realistic middle aged romantic fantasies with excellent dialogue forever. The smooth men plot was great, the chemistry between the characters was great, and the worldbuilding remains excellent.

I also love-- so in romance novels the "thing that characters give as a reason for not getting together" is often referred to as the 'no way.' A I love that a significant part of the 'no way' is "but she's a NUN." "But she's not a celibate nun." "STILL A NUN."

Valedor by Guy Haley

This is a re-read of a beloved Warhammer book, about Space Elves fighting Space Bugs and Tragically Dying. I remain steadfast in my opinion that it is excellent, but it needed more of my favourite, Prince Yriel, he who spends most of the book having awful meetings with half a spoon and calculating how best to kill people with it.

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

Books

Paladin's Grace by T Kingfisher

I had heard good things about T Kingfisher, and borrowed the first book my library had without looking into it at all. So I was a bit surprised, after it opened on a severed head, to find out it was a romance. It's a very good romance though! The dialogue is top notch, and really sells you on why the leads should be together.

My only complaint is actually downstream of it being well written: Grace is an accurate* portrayal of living with trauma. This sometimes makes her internal monologue deeply irritating. But I want to give Kingfisher points for writing a character with a mental illness that just doesn't go away when it's narratively inconvenient, and is a really accurate depiction of a specific experience. And also: Grace has a conception of what's going on that makes sense for someone who lives in a fantasy world without the DSM, and it's so great to see.

*I am not the Queen of Knowing PTSD, and could be inaccurate myself, but. You know what I mean.

The Templars by Dan Jones

I am who I am-- I am a sucker for elite historical cavalries. And now I know more about the Templars!

This is a chronological, ~narrative history of the Knights Templar. (There's actually a funny section in the introduction, where the author feels he has to justify presenting events in chronological. "I know us professional historians know that time is an illusion made up by Big Chronology to sell more Timelines, but I'm having to explain this to lay people!") I found it quite readable, and I liked how the author actually got into the potential biases of different sources.

The Knights Templar was an odd organisation: it was simultaneously incredibly competent ('training not to break formation' was a devastating military technology for all it's simplicity, and they were good at it) and incredibly dumb (a requirement to always follow orders and leaders that semi-regularly went "what, are you a chicken? buk-buk-bukAWK!" in the face of overwhelming force lead to dumb outcomes.) Also, all the individual knights were (relatively) poor, but the organisation was swimming in cash. (Louis the IX got kidnapped and needed to raise a ransom. The Knights Templar would not give a loan, because they had sworn an oath to keep the treasure in safe keeping. "But you know, if you took the treasure by force, we'd simply have to get compensation for it once we got back to Acre, hintHINT.")

I now know more about the Mamluks, and am going to have to research them, as another elite historical cavalry :P

My one quibble with the book is that there is a time skip, and the thing they skip over is the Knights Templar and the Knights Hospitaller having a proxy war on behalf of Venice and Genoa, which feels like a weird thing to skip?

I knew that the Templar order fell because of Phillip the Fair, who had very realpolitik reasons for getting rid of them. But also he seemed to um, believe his own wild claims about the Templar's 'heresy?' It's weird in that this 13th century guy is very recognisably doing something similar to QAnon??? Very weird.

Also, fun fact that will now haunt me forever: the Knights Templar? Long gone. There is no secret order of Templar knights that still stands (because... how? The leadership died, everyone else got absorbed into other monastic orders.) The Teutonic knights, those johnny-come-latelies to the crusades? They're still a going concern... technically. There's not many of them and they mostly provide pastoral care to German ex-pats. But the Knights Hospitaller, whatever happened to them? I mean, it would be weird if throughout the last 800 or so years they were a going concern, even weirder if they were still having notable influence over the world. Like, it would be strange if a crusading era organisation was doing first aid for music festivals, teaching CPR, or running the Northern Territory's ambulance service. ...yep.

Links

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

Unsafe by Cathy Glass* Another Cathy Glass foster memoir, but a different flavour than usual. The gap between the events and publishing them was a lot smaller, and well. It wasn't "Here's how I helped this kid, while optionally discovering why their family is Like That." It was "and here is why I retired from foster caring." It's a good portrait of why exactly she got disillusioned.

A House By The Sea and The Ones Who Come At Last by PH Lee Two short stories, both responses to Omelas. The first is "what happens when the forsaken children grow up" and the second is "what if refugees came to Omelas." Both very good examples of the genre, and both free.

Still Life With Bones by Alexa Haggerty

This one is about the experiences of an anthropologist exhuming bodies from mass graves from genocides, and thus discussion is going under the cut.

Read more... )

WTF Is Tarot by Baraka Wintner

I will preface this by saying that I'm coming at this from a weird angle: 1. I think Tarot works, but for mundane and non-supernatural reasons. 2. I'm refreshing my Tarot knowledge because I like to use it as a randomisation tool to generate ideas for stories.

I'm of two minds about recommending this book. It is a very readable book, and I do like the author's willingness to swear and use anecdote to explain cards instead of dry lists. I think there's also some useful ideas in her specific practice: for example, The Fool card features a picture of someone leaping off a cliff. She uses what card The Fool is leaping towards as a tool for analysis. Is it leaping towards a positive card? Be a holy fool, no thoughts head empty, just go for it! Is it leaping towards a negative card? COMMON SENSE IS COMMON FOR A REASON AND YOU SHOULD USE IT.

But I have two big caveats.

(And this is under a cut just because it is long)

Read more... )

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

Books

The Mongol Storm by Nicholas Morton

It's a book about the geopolitical affects of the Mongol Empire especially in the Middle East/ North Africa/ Eastern Europe. I quite enjoyed it, though I kept having moments of "alas, history is not written by the victors... it's written by the literate people who decided to write down history."* It's mostly about how it affected the other empires and kingdoms in the region, so I know a lot more about the Crusader States (bad at things unless they were the Templars, thought the Mongols were Coming to Help) and the Abayyid Empire (descendants of Saladin, had particularly chaotic inheritance policies.) Also I found about exactly how horrifying the sack of Baghdad was, so that's... fun.

content warnings for mass death and sexual assault )

*The Mongol Empire did write things, they just tended to be, uh. prosaic. Unless they were threats. Sometimes they wrote those down!

Bride's Story volume 1 by Kaoru Mori

This is a very pretty historical romance manga with pretty clothes and horses, about a 20 year old steppe nomad woman in an arranged marriage to a 12 year old boy in a settled town in Central Asia. I mostly enjoyed it? The art is very nice, and there's a good sense of atmosphere which is what I like in a historical. There's just the... let's be charitable and call it 'the age gap.' The manga doesn't ogle the boy, but it does ogle him ogling her, you know what I mean? I'm not sure if I'm going to read the later volumes, we'll see.

Mummy Told Me Not To Tell by Cathy Glass

Cathy Glass is an experience foster mother who has written so many memoirs about her fostering children. They're very readable brain candy; I read this one in one day. I enjoyed it, but I don't think it's her best. Some of this is just 'real life does not always give you good arcs, even if you try hard to squash it into one,' some of this is me having an allergy to hiding information from children to avoid "sullying" them, especially when you have good reason to believe the child already knows.

Links:

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

"Wolffy, aren't you doing arbitrary novel editing November? Presumably this means you have less books and links than usual." Uhhh.

Books

The Truth, Men At Arms and Feet of Clay by Terry Pratchett

I fell on a bunch of Terry Pratchett audio books these past few days. I don't have much to say about them as individuals? They're Terry Pratchett books.

But. Reading them has reminded me of a bug bear I have about the Pratchett fandom.

90s British Author Compare and Contrast )

On Editing by Helen Corner-Bryant and Kathryn Price

This is a book about the persnickety details of line editing, things like not head hopping and avoiding homoerotic POV weirdnesses (no, really, that's an example they used) and showing not telling. It's a lot of fairly standard advice, in an exhaustive and methodical manner.

Plot and Structure by James Scott Bell

This is one of the plotting books I've read recently that I've found the most useful. I should warn that Bell is really obviously a Thriller author, and it shows in his advice? He treats 'everyman' protagonists as a viable option, and does not really grok Romance which makes his advice for it a little weird.

But overall, it's a good broad scale overview of plot structure, and also has some good technique advice. There's a whole chapter on different outlining method for various levels of plotting and pantsing, which I cannot summarise that would be too close to just copying chapter. But it's really good. (Also, the method I use is described as 'The Borg Method' which, fuck you, Bell [affectionate.])

There's also some really good writerly psychological advice. I'm putting his advice for getting past the Mid Point Blues, because it is really good:

  1. Go somewhere quiet and just chill for half an hour. No writing, no talking, no reading. Just chill, alone
  2. Do something fun. Go to the movies! Go window shopping! Do something of some sort.
  3. Fall asleep with a warm glass of milk and your favourite book.
  4. and when you wake up, IMMEDIATELY WRITE SOMETHING. DO NOT STOP. DO NOT PASS GO. WRITE

Which I can see working on me.

Links

But, like. If I had to pick a genre to get plotting advice from a successful writer of it from, thriller is at the top of the list.

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

Short Stories

  • The V*mpire by PH Lee: Really good! Can read it for free! Mind the warnings! It's about the very particular viper pit of 2010s queer tumblr. It's about abusive relationships. It's about abusive vampires in 2010s queer tumblr. I spent the whole day after reading it with a mental red string board. It's great.

Links: - Why is my TV saying it hates me? - a guide on small talk written for nurses.

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

Some Desperate Glory by Emily Tesh

It's this year's Hugo Best Novel! It's also written by the person who is why Nirvana in Fire and the Silmarillion's orphan_account fic is weirdly good!

After Earth is destroyed in an alien invasion, the last few true patriots mutiny and take ships to an uninhabited system, to build a new society to avenge the Earth. Kyr grew up on Gaea Station as one of the best of her mess, and she is ready to do what ever it takes to serve Gaea Station.

..Kyr learns just how wrong she is.

The book is about patriarchy and child abuse and generational trauma and the sort of society's abusers set up, and, most importantly, Why Sparta Sucks So Bad and Do Not Build The Laconic Torment Nexus.

It's really good, and it's also best to go into it with as few spoilers as possible, other than "it contains all the content warnings."

...but I can't resist talking about the ending.

Read more... )

This book made me cry at the end and so few books do that.

Links

I have decided to have themed links this time, namely, I'm going to share all the Wyll fan songs I have been listening to on loop.

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

Books

It's a medieval double feature, baby!

The Middle Ages: Everyday Life by Jeffrey L Singman

This book deliberately tries to be a mid-point between "books aimed at high schoolers" and "academic texts," something for the interested adult that doesn't know too much already. It's divided into sections based on different groups in the Medieval period, from peasants in villages to nobles in castles to monks to people in towns. It focuses a lot on daily living, especially ~material aspects like "what did they eat?" "what were their houses like?" and "what as a daily schedule." I have to say, while I wouldn't want this as my only source if I was writing historical fiction, it'd be a great place to start. I now have a much better idea of how castles actually worked! I know the monkly schedule! I KNOW WHAT THE THREE FIELD SYSTEM IS! My only caveat is that Singman has... interesting opinions on the Medieval diet. (He over weights the 'Medieval peasants didn't get heart disease' and under weights 'Medieval peasants regularly got scurvy and sometimes starved to death.'

Queens of the Crusades by Alison Weir

aka Plantagenets Behaving Badly.

This is about Eleanor of Aquitane, her descendants, and their wives. It's also about the giant mess of arranged marriages, and the ways a lot of the Plantagenet men made it so much worse by being physically incapable of keeping it in their pants. (At one point one of them had an open affair with his son's betrothed, which would have been bad enough except that under Medieval Catholicism, that made his son's marriage incestuous, but they couldn't explain it without pissing off the betrothed's father who was King of France, and a whole bunch of wars happened because of this.)

Though some of the Plantagenet men are nice to their wives! ...and let them be some of the worst landlords in the history of being landlords.

Oh, and I learned that Richard the Lionheart was a rapist which. makes the child friendly Robin Hood stories read very differently. And also the general historical remembrance of him. deeply frustrating.

There's something about having that all laid out chronologically which is Englightening about the Times and Culture. It's a heavy read, but I did enjoy it.

Links

  • Psych wards are really poorly designed. Admittedly I like this one because it's a psychiatrist pointing out things that even I, a layman, had noticed, and it's very vindicating! (Eg things like "if you get obsessed with safety and that's the only thing you measure, you create places that are awful to be and are ...bad... for people's mental health.")
  • Australian Indigenous are and dot controversies. This is an interesting news article about the thing where-- the standard idea of Indigenous Australian art is dots? Except that's a very Western Desert thing (which was where one of the first big successful studios was.) But now it's become a general signifier of Indigenous art, and this drives some people up the wall, eg artists who are not from the Western Desert who have researched their culture's traditional art and are having to fight to go 'the thing I am making is traditional! We didn't use dots!', and also artists from the Western Desert who are a bit "...hey... this doesn't become totally chill and not totally cultural appropriation just because other Indigenous people are doing it..." Interesting article, well worth a read.
  • and for something short and sweet: a funny skit about dreams
wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)
**An Immense World by Ed Yong**

This is a really interesting book, about all the different kinds of senses in the animal kingdom, and how and why different sense adaptations work, from really basic eyes to the fact insects just keep evolving new ears to echolocation. It covers some pretty complex topics, but Yong keeps it understandable and accessible. Read it to learn about lions being unable to see a zebra's stripes, to what star nosed moles' star is for, to the way pain is weird!

I thoroughly enjoyed it and can highly recommend it.

...it did have the unfortunate side effect of making me really aware of the fact that I could feel the book with my finger tips, and the way my eyes had to interpret light to read it. ...and also the fact it's kind of weird that I managed to locate a drill rig purely by hearing it.


** Chernobyl 01:23:40 by Andrew Leatherbarrow**

Half this book is about how the Chernobyl disaster happened, the aftermath of it, and comparing to other nuclear disasters before and after it. The other half is about the author's photography trip to the Pripyat exclusion zone.
I liked this, but I have to caveat this with the fact I don't know how accurate this is? Leatherbarrow evidently has exhaustively researched it, but he's not an academic as such. I do overall trust what he's said, but like. Choose your own trust thresholds. He's quite the engaging author, and I did enjoy his description of the experience of being in the exclusion zone. (He is also Amusingly Reddit, and I don't meant this in a mean way, just-- he keeps going talking about "oh, this is the swimming pool made famous by Call of Duty" and "oh, you know urban explorers are," and I don't know how urban explorers are, but please continue Mr Leatherbarrow.)

Also, stuff about safety culture in the USSR was horrifying and haunting, but I'm... glad to know it?

**Links**

On some lighter notes:

- [how the ownership of Pokemon is more complicated than God like a heretical Christian trinity.](https://youtu.be/jfSKAvbAUUk?si=c3W7txEu9ODPyBPd) (I love Moon Channel's video essays, even when they go a bit bonkers like this one.)
- [a funny skit about dreams](https://youtube.com/shorts/g9919n4dF7M?si=7WOqt629XhBjtGWa)
wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

A Distant Mirror by Barbara Tuchman

I actually read this a while ago! And could have sworn I wrote it up here, but apparently not? I can recommend it as book about the 14th Century. It's dense as hell, but it's very informative. It follows the life of Enguerrand de Coucy, normal-ish nobleman who had a lot written about him, as a scaffold for following what the heck was going on at the time, but the book often gets side tracked by mystery plays or discussions of how inheritance works. It's real good! Also, depressing.

The Wave by Susan Casey

I borrowed this book because it claimed to be about the science of waves, especially big, 100ft waves. And it's... not not about that? But primarily, it is anthropological and narrative look at big wave surfer culture in the late 2000s, with a smattering of science, insurance, and salvage to round it out.

And I would have preferred more science and salvage, but I can't say I disliked learning about surfer culture? Though I'm not sure Casey realised how excitingly toxic the culture she was talking about is? (Big wave surfing requires teamwork, which leads to dynamics where you can't stop unless you have a good enough 'excuse' like nearly dying. It's very sexist. And-- okay this might be my weird bugbear, but it's obviously really expensive, but no one seems to ever ask where the money comes from? It took me till nearly the end of the book to realise one of the main people being followed owns a pineapple farm, and I'm not 100% on whether he works it himself or not.) But yeah, I can admit to being interested by the adrenaline junkies. And also the way the waves at different places have-- distinct personalities? And some of it is anthropomorphism, sure, but it's not unjustified anthropomorphism? But it's also funny how while all these locations are chosen because they might produce real big waves, people talk about each location very differently; Jaws is the Grand Empress, Teahupo'o will fuck you up and maybe kill you but in a fun way, Ghosttree will fuck you up and you will hate every minute of it, etc.

The book is also an unintentional period piece? There's discussions of climate change and women that are. very 2008. It's Distinctive. The sexism I can explain-- there's a lot of normalised sexual harrassment and women as decoration in a way that's seen as indecorous now. The climate change is harder to put my finger on, but. yeah. Distinctly 2008.

Also, big wave surfing is another one to add to my silly list: you know how anti kink people like to use the existance of sub drop as evidence kink is unethical? I like to keep a list of things that cause something that is clearly subdrop, while not being kinky at all. Big wave surfing: not unethical because it's sexist, dangerous, or expensive. Yes unethical because getting dommed by Neptune causes subdrop.

A Rape in Cyberspace by Julie Dibbel link Warning for sexual assault and harassment.

Another period piece! This is an essay about an incident that happened at a MUD (think text based roleplay thing with a database behind it), where someone else took control of other people's characters to force them to do violent and sexual things, and the community's response to it. It's very much about the early days of the internet and working out how to deal with bad behaviour. It's also about [wiggles hands] harms that can be done in cyberspace, what it means to be hurt when it's a virtual body that gets hurt and what that means for the meat person behind it. It's an interesting read!

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

On The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin

I continue my project of borrowing audio versions of classic books I 'should' read from the library and listening to them at work.

I overall enjoyed this, but I am a biology nerd.

Some scattered thoughts:

  • Wow, scientific publishing has really changed over the years. He calls this novel length thing an 'abstract' (!) and claims he didn't have time to include citations so he just didn't (!!!)
  • man, the levels of scientific racism in this are both completely expected and deeply unpleasant. And-- okay, so there's a way he talks about the introduction of European animals being introduced to Australia/New Zealand/South America, with a certain air of how it's only natural that the superior European animals have outcompeted them. And I'm not claiming that Darwin is being racist towards the animals-- they're animals, you can't be racist towards them? But the way he talks about animals in other ways rhymes uncomfortably with the way he talks about the Indigenous groups and, yeah. There sure is a vibe of "naturally superior European animals, plants and people, who will natural outcompete, etc" which is. not great.
  • Darwin is a really good persuasive writer. He's very good at carefully going through the objections to his theory of natural selection, and puncturing them one by one.
  • I love all the weird experiments he did to try and work out things like 'how could animals spread across the ocean?' where he puts like, eggs in sea water and then feeds them to fish which he then feeds to a pelican, etc. It's some real boots on ground Victorian experimentalism. You love to see it.
  • His conclusion gave me emotions. And, look, I'm a known sap for that certain brand of scientific awe-- think Brian Cox documentaries, etc. But. Man.

Here's a quote:

Although I am fully convinced of the truth of the views given in this volume under the form of an abstract, I by no means expect to convince experienced naturalists whose minds are stocked with a multitude of facts all viewed, during a long course of years, from a point of view directly opposite to mine. It is so easy to hide our ignorance under such expressions as the “plan of creation,” “unity of design,” etc., and to think that we give an explanation when we only restate a fact. Any one whose disposition leads him to attach more weight to unexplained difficulties than to the explanation of a certain number of facts will certainly reject my theory. A few naturalists, endowed with much flexibility of mind, and who have already begun to doubt on the immutability of species, may be influenced by this volume; but I look with confidence to the future, to young and rising naturalists, who will be able to view both sides of the question with impartiality. Whoever is led to believe that species are mutable will do good service by conscientiously expressing his conviction; for only thus can the load of prejudice by which this subject is overwhelmed be removed.

And! Darwin! You can look with confidence to the future, Darwin! You won! The 'young naturalists' did help! They found DNA and continental drift and*Pre Cambrian soft bodied fossils* and are just waiting on the invention of a time machine to show you the super cool phylogenetic trees they've been making.

[sobs] There are 'endless forms most beautiful'! There is 'grandeur in this view of life'!

The Women of the Magna Carta by Sharon Bennett Connolly

I occaisionally had moments, when people made tumblr posts about how Medieval fantasy didn't really get the Medieval, and I pined because I had no clue how to find stuff out about what they were talking about.

And look. I do not claim to be an expert on the Medieval period after one book. But, the stuff about hostage taking and arranged marriages, specifically? I think I get it now.

The book is just. A whole string of people getting married off at weird ages, getting widowed and remarried and joining convents and getting kidnapped or getting their husbands kidnapped. People try and piece together whether spouses got along based on whether they put out charters under both of their names. Dower lands are constantly getting transferred, but I'm still slightly confused what they are. You have to pay a fine if you marry your kids without the king's permission, but this seems to be treated as more of a tax? We're having to work out people's birthdates based on when they get married. People keep becoming childless widows at 17. It's just. So much.

(One of the provisions in the Magna Carta makes it so you can't force a widow to remarry, if she wants to remain a childless widow throughout her life. Which some of these childless teenage widows took advantage of!)

But one thing that's sticking with me-- is it's given me another excuse for 'why would you have arranged gay marriages in a pseudo medieval setting?' So, I would have to double check who exactly this happened to, but there was a guy who ended up getting married to a fifty year old widow when he was twenty. And like. Everyone involved knew he was not getting an heir that way? But he needed access to land (via his wife) more urgently, and there's some stuff that makes it look like the king was blackmailing him about marrying this woman? Both some 'marry her or else, I know you need the land' with a side of 'and oh nooo... if you don't have children... however shall I, the king, cope...."

So. Hey. One could write a gay arranged marriage in a pseudo medieval setting happening out of land rights shenanigans and the king trying to blackmail someone out of having an heir?

(Unfortunately through a quick skim of the book again I cannot find it, and all I have is "i think the woman was called either Isabelle or Eleanor, and the man may have been named Simon?") (Everyone in that century was named Isabel, Eleanor, Simon or William. People kept passing their names down to their children or divorcing annulling their marriage to one Isabel to marry another.)

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

Legendborn by Tracy Deonn

I ended up in a loop of borrowing it from the library, getting partway through and having to return it to give to the next person in the hold queue, and then waiting in the hold queue to borrow it again. But finally! I have escaped the loop! And I really enjoyed it.

Brianna Matthews has been accepted into an early college program shortly after her mother died in a hit and run accident. She's not coping, and not helping is the fact she's found out there's a group of mind wiping demon hunters on campus that might be responsible for her mother's death.

I like Bree's POV; she comes across as being on the raw edge of a break down all the time.

There's another thing I liked, but it's difficult to explain without spoilers. So, you know how often in fantasy stories you get half fairy characters where it's obviously a metaphor for being mixed race, or werewolves as a disability metaphor, but there's zero non metaphorically mixed race or disabled people? Legendborn very much does not do that. Bree is black, and the story is a lot about family and legacy and the way racism affects that, and it comes up in both supernatural and mundane contexts.

I also like how magic works in this setting. There are different groups of magic users, and while you can tell they are all grasping on to different parts of the same elephant, they have wildly different ideas about what's possible and what's morally licit.

Fair warning: it's very YA, so maybe skip if you are not one for masquerades and tournaments and love triangles.

The Anthropocene Reviewed by John Green

An essay collection about different aspects of the human centred planet, with the conceit that he's rating each on a five star scale.

I enjoyed it but-- I very much grew up on vlog brothers? Including John's philosophical videos. So I'm not sure if it's objectively good or just ~tastes like home?

Though it was interesting as a glimpse into John Green's writing process, which comes across as a bit and bizarre to me.

I give the Anthropocene Reviewed 4 stars.

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

I have been ~~procrastinating~~ waiting to write this post until I had 'enough' books and links, but then I decided, screw it, let's do this now.

How Minds Change by David McRaney

There is a truism in political science, especially now, that you can't actually change people's minds. They're set in their ways, and nothing anyone can ever do will ever convince anyone of anything. Except that's not actually... true? There's many examples of people changing their minds, from individual examples of people who left cults and conspiracy theories, to broader scale things like 'same sex marriage could not have got as much popular support as quickly without people changing their minds.' This book is a book about the science behind changing people's minds. It's also a book about why we even disagree in the first place-- with a really interesting chapter about That Dress that was either gold and white or black and blue, and how that was a really unusual optical illusion that prompted a bunch of study, because most optical illusions people can switch which version they see, but they really could not for the dress. But there's also things about the way that 'the truth is tribal' and also the some of the scientifically supported methods of changing people's minds (and the way those techniques seem to keep getting independently reinvented.) It's a really interesting book!

And now, some links:

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

I have a book to recommend! Her Voice is a Backwards Record, the best novella based on a philosophy paper I've read.

If all physically possible universes exist, so do all physically possible girlfriends… including the one you're imagining who's imagining you.

Ana's parents, who hadn't heard that it wasn't game-theoretically optimal to punish her for dropping LSD, packed her away to a troubled teen camp. During the day, Ana faces the harsh Utah desert, near-starvation, and torture in the name of "therapy." At night, she seeks desperate comfort in the arms of her alternate-universe girlfriend, Yuya, one of three hundred wives in the harem of the Emperor of Every World. But as their respective prisons wear away at their very selves, both girls face a choice: to become the monsters those in authority want them to be, or to die trying to escape.

Caveats:

  • I do personally know the author and helped beta this. I wouldn't recommend something I didn't like just because someone I knew wrote it, but I will admit to being biased
  • there is torture and institutional abuse in this one. It's Heavy.
  • on a lighter note, Ana and Yuya do have explicit multiversarial sex while 17, so that's a heads up for that if you want it.

Book Post!

May. 27th, 2024 01:21 pm
wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

Humble Pi by Matt Parker

This is a reread for me, and I'm glad I reread it. It's a non-fiction book about maths mistakes, and the ways maths can take us further than our intuition can, but this is a double edged sword because then we can't use our intuition to check it.

It's a hilarious book, and MacDonald's maths mistake will stay with me forever.

The Queen of Attolia by Megan Whalen Turner

Sequel to The Thief, and it's the book that made me go "ah, I see why [friend] likes it so much." Said friend really likes political drama and whump, so. (One of the major characters ends up newly disabled in this book, and while I can't confirm whether that arc is accurate, I can say it is very well written.)

Also the romance arc is unhinged, but in a way that kept making me go "HELL YEAH!"

Come As You Are by Emily Nagoski

This is a non-fiction book about the science of sex, especially women's sexuality, with an eye to being of practical use for problem solving.

I did also enjoy the amount it ended up having to explain the neurology behind pleasure in general, or stress in general, or frustration in general-- especially because it did things like "and here's why how frustration works in the brain leads to the 'don't orgasm' reverse psychology working."

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

Passage to Dawn by RA Salvatore

This is the 10th book in the Legends of Drizzt series, and the last one I own. I can see why past me stopped here. It's not bad, as such, but there's this distinct thing of undoing narrative progress to go back (literally) where things started, as if Salvatore realised in the last book he was stuck. But it doesn't feel like the characters going full circle, it feels like taking things back to fix a problem that isn't actually a problem.

The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli

I have a lot of time at work to listen to audio books, and I've taken to listening to classics (along with other books, of course.)

It's interesting, and also reading it solved a plot problem I was having. It's interesting seeing all the "intuitively doing x feels correct, and you should never, ever do x."

I can also say that people using The Prince as general life advice makes more sense than the Art of War, though now I feel a deep urge to shout "IN ~~MICE~~ STATECRAFT" whenever it came up.

How Many More Women? by Jennifer Robinson and Keina Yoshida

A look at the way laws screw over women who have been abused and media that tries to report on it, especially civil laws like defamation laws and non disclosure agreements. It's deeply depressing and enraging, but it's a good look at the system (and the "the system is for what it does" thing.)

The Thief by Megan Whalen Turner

Recommended to me by a friend, and I'm glad I went in knowing that the narrator is constantly hiding things up his sleeves. I think otherwise I would have been annoyed by it not being a fair play mystery, but instead I was having a lot of fun watching the narrator's cuffs.

It's set in a fantasy Byzantium, with a strong political bent. Our hero, General, unwisely boasted he could steal anything and backed it up by stealing the kings seal. Now, he's been recruited by the king's Magus to retrieve a mythical stone of immortality that the king has promised to give to a foreign queen in marriage. Things Escalate From There.

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

So, I haven't done one of these for awhile. One may think that's because I have not been reading. But I have! Just... one book. Slowly. And then a bunch of shorter books that I inhaled this afternoon.

The Reality Dysfunction: Emergence by Peter F Hamilton )

Madgic #1 by Mori of LB Lee )

Coming In Or Staying Out by Rogan and Biff of LB Lee )

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)

Legends and Lattes by Travis Baldree

A fantasy novel that is like drinking a mocha in a cozy cafe. There's more progression than conflict. I don't want to say it's low stakes, so much as stakes are dealt with quickly and with things ending up even better for the characters. Which in my opinion came across as weird at points? But like. If you want an aggressively cozy "orc makes a Cafe in a fantasy world" it fits the bill well.

Salt by Mark Kurlansky

History of salt. DNF. It didn't come across as ~credible as I like. (Some potential linguistic clunkers in the chapter on China, and treating Africa as one giant lump, that sort of thing.)

Profile

wolffyluna: A green unicorn holding her tail in her mouth (Default)
wolffyluna

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5678910
1112 131415 1617
18192021222324
252627282930 31

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 07:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios